Template:Chapter 1.4: Difference between revisions

From Farmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<div> <div class="title"><h1>1.4 - Sowing seeds in rows (line sowing)</h1><br><h3 class="ch-owner">Mitchell van Schepen, University of Guelph, Canada</h3></div> <div class="ch-navber" style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between;"> <div class="center-side" style="max-width: 100%;margin-right: 3%;"> <div style="margin-top: 30px;"> <h3 class="title-bg">Background</h3> <div class="cont-bg"> <p>The world’s 1 billion women and girls...")
 
No edit summary
 
(8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div>
<div>
  <div class="title"><h1>1.4 - Sowing seeds in rows (line sowing)</h1><br><h3 class="ch-owner">Mitchell van Schepen, University of Guelph, Canada</h3></div>
  <div class="title"><h3>1.4 -Sowing seeds in rows (line sowing)</h3><br><h3 class="ch-owner">Kirsten Radcliffe, University of Guelph, Canada</h3></div>
<div class="hero-img-2">
[[File:Img4 1.jpeg|300px]]
<p><b>Related video(s)</b>: Grow row by row (Source: Access Agriculture)</p>
<p><i>https://www.accessagriculture.org/grow-row-row?cat_id=1499</i></p>
 
<p>Suggested citation for this chapter.</p>
<p>Radcliffe,K. (2022) Sowing seeds in rows (line sowing). In Farmpedia, The Encyclopedia for Small Scale Farmers. Editor, M.N. Raizada, University of Guelph, Canada. http://www.farmpedia.org</p>
</div>
  <div class="ch-navber" style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between;">
  <div class="ch-navber" style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between;">
  <div class="center-side" style="max-width: 100%;margin-right: 3%;">
  <div class="center-side" style="max-width: 100%;margin-right: 3%;">
       <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h3 class="title-bg">Background</h3>
       <h1 class="title-bg">Introduction</h1>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
           <p>The world’s 1 billion women and girls participating in subsistence farming pull weeds by hand to improve their crops and also collect firewood for cooking, resulting in their hands becoming rough and sore (Figure 1). This can be caused by wood splinters being lodged into their skin (Schaffner, 2013). Pulling weeds for hours on end can peel away layers of skin (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2016). The hands of those farmers can also become dirty and smelly from planting seeds in the soil or spreading manure by hand. To avoid the common aforementioned problems as well as hand injuries, such as cuts and scrapes, they could wear gloves on their hands, see the second picture, (Schaffner, 2013). Gloves are very common in the modern world and can be used for construction, farming, and medical practices. Gloves provide a durable layer between the skin on your hands and whatever you are working with (Espasandín-Arias & Goossens, 2014). There are a few different materials used to make gloves, along with different sizes and grips. With over one billion women and girls working on farms around the world, this grueling work can be made safer and more efficient when wearing gloves.</p>
           <p>Introduction:
 
Traditionally, subsistence farmers have utilized a method known as broadcasting to sow seeds. Generally, broadcasting involves manually dispersing seeds throughout the field by throwing handfuls over the soil. In order for farmers to obtain a substantial yield with broadcasting, seeds must be sown at a relatively high density. Since the seeds were dispersed on the soil surface, some seeds could be lost to birds or field run-off during rainstorms (Johansen, Haque, Bell, Thierfelder, & Esdaile, 2012). Alternatively, line sowing involves sowing seeds in uniform rows either manually or with machinery (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). This sowing method allows for higher yields due to reduced plant competition for sunlight, water, and nutrients. Additionally, sowing seeds in rows allows for enhanced weed and pest management since farmers can more easily move through the field to removed weeds and monitor crops for pests or disease (Barberi, 2002).  
          <p>Rubber and cloth are the two main kinds of gloves produced (Melco, 2016). They both have their own benefits and drawbacks respectively. A benefit from rubber gloves is their ability to resist water from coming in contact with a farmer's skin, see part two, (Espasandín-Arias & Goossens, 2014). While cloth gloves can be beneficial because they can draw moisture away from their hands and can be easily washed to be cleaned. Because rubber gloves are usually meant to be disposed of after single use they tend to be cheaper to make and thus cheaper to buy. Yet some rubber gloves can be made thicker to reuse and are slightly more durable (Melco, 2016). Cloth gloves are designed to be washed after being used and last a long time under normal working conditions.</p>
</div>
 
          <p>Along with the different materials gloves are made of, there are also different arm lengths. Some gloves are cut off just in front or around the wrist. While others can be up to and over the elbow and everywhere in between (Melco, 2016). The benefits of the shorter gloves is comfort, no bunching around wrist or elbow, and they can be quickly put on or removed. The benefits of the long gloves are more protection, the entire forearm will be covered. All the while there is less of a chance of getting debris in their gloves because the opening is farther away from what you are working with. Farmers can also work in deeper water or mud with the long rubber gloves without getting your hands wet.</p>
 
          <p>When working with smooth items such as hoes and some fruits and vegetables they can be slippery (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2016). A way to help farmer's hold on to the tools is to get gloves with grips (Melco, 2016). Both rubber and cloth gloves can have grips. Rubber gloves will have ridges in the molds to form grips and granular materials can be added to the outside before drying (Melco, 2016). Another option is to make the rubber gloves out of a non-slip rubber (Melco, 2016). Because cloth alone does not provide grip, cloth gloves must be dipped in liquid rubber to be able to grip smooth objects. The rubber used for grips on cloth gloves can either be non-slip smooth rubber or be rigid (Melco, 2016). </p>
    </div>
   </div>
   </div>
 
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h1 class="title-bg">Benefits of Line Seeding</h1>
       <h3 class="title-bg">Physical Protection</h3>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
          <p>Protection is the main benefit from using gloves. Repetitive motions, such as when pounding grain, can cause irritation to the skin. When collecting firewood the sticks and logs can scratch or cut the skin (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2016). Weeds can be rough and by scratching their hands many times they can become cut and sore (Espasandín-Arias & Goossens, 2014). By lifting and pulling heavy items the top layer of your skin will separate from the next, causing a blister, by wearing gloves they now will prevent blistering because the glove will act as the top layer of skin and prevent the actual skin from separating (Schaffner, 2013). Manure has a lot of bacteria in it which are harmful if they are swallow, so keeping them away from the hands used to eat with is very beneficial (Furlong, et al., 2015). If farmers are working with firewood or in construction the cloth gloves will work better because they are more durable (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2016). The disposable rubber gloves would be the worst to use in this scenario because they are so thin, stick to jobs were the main goals are to keep hands dry and dirt free when using disposable rubber gloves.</p>
<p>Sunlight, water, and nutrients are all essential components to the development and growth of plants. Plants absorb sunlight using the photo pigments in their leaves, which is then converted into energy for growth (Maddonni & Martinez-Bercovich, 2014). Depending on the plant species the efficiency of this conversion process differs slightly (Tesfaye, Walker, & Tsubo, 2006). When plants become too crowded, competition for access to sunlight, nutrients, and water ensues.</p> <p>Unfortunately, many farmers sow their crop seeds at a higher density than what is recommended by their local extension services resulting in increased levels of plant stress and the subsequent reduction in crop yields (Wiyo, Kasomekera, & Feyen, 1999). Access to sunlight plays a major role in determining crop yield as it is essential to plant growth. A study conducted by Maddonni and Martinez-Bercovich found that maize grain yield is primarily determined by kernel number per unit land, which is positively correlated with the amount of photo synthetically active radiation intercepted by the leaves (2014). Plants, which emerge earlier, will have competitive advantage in this situation, surpassing the others in growth and eventually blocking the surrounding plants access to sunlight (Maddonni & Martinez-Bercovich, 2014). The larger the size of the leaf and the shorter the period required for leaf development will allow for greater radiation interception. Singels and Smit conducted research on sugarcane and row spacing, finding that leaf development is affected by row spacing (2009). The higher rates of leaf development occurred in the wider rows, indicating that plants require adequate space to access sunlight and nutrients required for growth (Singels & Smit, 2009). Similarly, plants, which are able to develop their root systems earlier, will have greater success in obtaining the scarce water and nutrients vital for growth (Barberi, 2002). The practice of sowing seeds in lines allows for optimum sunlight exposure, and soil water utilization. Maddonni and Martinez-Bercovich discovered that grain yield reductions were most prevalent in fields where crops were planted in higher densities (2014). In addition, broadcasting tends to require a higher seed input to compensate for losses, making line sowing a more beneficial choice when seed prices are high.</p>  
    </div>
<p>Sowing in rows enables farmers to monitor their crops for signs of pests or pathogens and have greater access to weeds. This aspect is extremely important as an unnoticed or untreated pest or pathogen could wipe out yields leaving the farmer with no income or food for that season. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vignaungviculata L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) are major grain legumes grown in semi-arid regions (Tesfaye et al., 2006). These legumes are a primary source of dietary protein and income for subsistence farmers. The dry matter production and subsequent yield has been found to be highly associated with the fraction of PAR intercepted by the plant (Tesfaye et al., 2006). Studies conducted by Barberi using pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) found that an inter-row distance of 40-50 centimetres allowed for optimal grain yields per unit and hoeing between rows (2001).</p>  
  </div>
</div>
 
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h3 style="background: #FBB03B;padding: 15px;font-weight: 600;color: #000;font-size: 22px;margin:unset;text-align:center;">Defense Against Moisture and Chemicals</h3>
        <div style="background: #FFD8A4;padding: 15px;font-weight: 400;color: #212529;font-size: 16px;margin:unset;line-height: 1.5;">
          <p>Moisture blocking is a way gloves can prevent your skin from drying out and from getting too wet and dehydrating farmer's hands. By keeping the moisture from the hands inside the gloves they will prevent the skin from cracking and becoming infected (Schaffner, 2013). As well when working in wet conditions your hands can shrivel and become dehydrated if they are constantly in contact with water.</p>
          <p>Pesticides can be absorbed by your skin and become harmful to the body, gloves provide an extra barrier to block them from entering in a farmer's body (Furlong, et al., 2015). Fertilizers such as nitrogen can also be caustic, and these are usually spread through broadcasting by hand. Mud can get under your nails and into cracked or cut skin and can infect a farmer's hands. Gloves will keep the mud out and keep hands clean. Both liquid pesticides and dry fertilizers can irritate skin if they come into contact with it (Kim, et al., 2013). Wearing the proper gloves, rubber ones in this case, can save their hands from becoming itchy (Keeble et al., 1996). Human skin can also absorb the pesticides which are harmful to your body, wearing gloves would prevent the pesticides from ever touching your skin.</p>
    </div>
   </div>
   </div>
 
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h1 class="title-bg">How to Practice</h1>
       <h3 class="title-bg">Wearable</h3>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
          <p>Comfortable gloves help farmer's work longer because their hands will not hurt from completing your task. Sizing is very important when finding comfortable gloves (Melco, 2016). Make sure gloves are the proper length and width, as not to restrict movement. There will be less pain from pulling weeds and they will be able to pull more weeds because they would not have to wait a long for the pain to subside between pulling each weed, because there will be no pain if wearing gloves (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2016). If farmer's find they are working hard and their hands start to sweat the gloves should be removed , dry your hands, and put on a new pair. Cloth gloves are more breathable then rubber ones, using them is another way to prevent hands from getting sweaty. The cloth gloves can also be softer and easier to clean, but are more restricting to movement due to their durability and tougher material. Since children will also be farming, smaller glove sizes can be found. Gloves are designed to fit a farmer's hand snugly, so children should not wear adult sized gloves when working. </p>
<p>A simple method that can be employed to sow seeds in rows involves the use of string and wood stakes. Depending on the region and species being planted row spacing will vary. Measuring the dimensions of the field is recommended to ensure uniform spacing between rows (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). To ensure the rows are straight, tie the string to two wood stakes and place the stakes at either end of the field making sure that the string is tight. The string acts to mark where the rows will be planted, acting as a visual guide for the sowing process. The seeds can either be dribbled into the furrows and covered over or put into a hole, which is created using a hoe (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). The method involving the use of a hoe to dig holes is typically used for larger crops, which require greater spacing between crops (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). Mechanized tools are also available to farmers at a relatively low cost. Jab planters enable the farmer to plant seeds into untilled soil, eliminating the labours tasks of digging holes and bending down to plant the seeds (Johansen et al., 2012). However, using this tool can bring challenges such as the tip becoming clogged with soil, taking away from its intended efficiency (Johansen et al., 2012). In order for line sowing to be most beneficial it must be employed with a corresponding weed suppression strategy such as a cover crop or herbicide treatment.</p>  
    </div>
</div>
   </div>
   </div>
 
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h1 class="title-bg">Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmers</h1>
       <h3 class="title-bg">Constraints To Adoption</h3>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
          <p>Gloves are very useful to farmers, but there can still be some drawbacks. Possible culturable taboos might vary from location to location. Gloves might seem feminine and not easily adopted by men in the community. Gloves act as a second, tougher skin, but they are not a farmer's skin and can slide around while working. This may feel odd and uncomfortable but farmers can get used to the new feeling over time. Gloves can come in many colours and thicknesses, which may make a farmer's hands look funny or larger. Human skin is very stretchy and flexible, while glove materials tend to be tougher than skin and will reduce movement, but not enough to hinder work. Rubber gloves can stretch well, but make hands sweat, while cloth gloves are breathable but reduce dexterity.</p>
[[Image:IMAGE 2.jpg|thumb|centre|Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmer|Click on the image to access a higher resolution image as well as lessons adapted for different geographic regions.]]</p>
          <p>Farmers can find gloves to use and get started from local vendors (European Commission For The Control Of Foot-And-Mouth Disease, 2016). Once you have completed your work for the day you can clean them are reuse them, or dispose of them if they were ripped or torn (Kim, et al., 2013). You can get gloves made of rubber and like materials as well as ones made of durable cloths. The thin rubber gloves tend to be made for a single use only. A trick that the European Commission For The Control Foot-And-Mouth Disease mentions that you can wear two pairs of rubber gloves at the same time for extra protection (European Commission For The Control Of Foot-And-Mouth Disease, 2016).</p>
<p><i>For the South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4.pdf</i></p>
    </div>
<p><i>For the East/South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4e.s.a.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the Sub-Saharan Africa/Caribbean version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4subsaharan_africa_carribean.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the Latin-America version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4latin_america.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For North Africa And Middle East version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4n._africa_middleeast.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>Source: MN Raizada and LJ Smith (2016) A Picture Book of Best Practices for Subsistence Farmers. eBook, University of Guelph Sustainable Agriculture Kit (SAK) Project, June 2016, Guelph, Canada. </i></p>
</div>
   </div>
   </div>
 
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h1 class="title-bg">Challenges</h1>
       <h3 class="title-bg">Helpful Links To Get Started </h3>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
          <p>Here are websites to find more information about how to obtain gloves:</p>
<p>Although planting seeds in rows is beneficial for yield levels it is also considerably time consuming. If farmers use manual line sowing methods they will have to prepare the field for sowing with a hoe before they can distribute the seeds. Compared to broadcasting seeds, line sowing requires significantly more time and labour, which may deter farmers from adopting it into their practices. This especially true in the case of lower value crops. However, a farmer may be more inclined to adopt line-sowing practices for higher value cash crops. For instance, farmers will almost always adopt line-sowing practices in the case of many fruits and vegetables, which are high in labour, value, input, and susceptible to pests and disease. Whereas, low value cereals and legumes are more likely to be broadcasted since the perceived benefit of adopting line sowing is not as high as in fruits and vegetables. Broadcasting seeds at higher densities can also be beneficial in suppressing weed populations. If a farmer does not have the time or labour available to keep up with the weeding of their fields broadcasting may be a better option. The field being used by a farmer is not always located near their house, limiting access and time available for weeding making broadcasting more attractive. Line sowing permits spaces in-between the rows of crops in which weeds can grow, where as, broadcasting leaves little space for weeds to develop. Furthermore, broadcasting can be successful in muddy soils, whereas, line sowing, which may require machinery or a jab planter, tends to be problematic. Depending on the land, line sowing may require both the jab planter and plough to loosen the soil first, whereas, broadcasting may need no field preparation. When deciding between line sowing and broadcasting it is very important to consider the crops being grown. Some crops can be quite successful in mixed broadcasting, while other such as corn struggle due to shading.</p>
          <p>[https://www.alibaba.com/ Alibaba]</p>
          <p>[https://www.indiamart.com/ Indiamart]</p>
          <p>[http://www.store.nzfarmsource.co.nz/ Store Nzfarmsource]</p>
          <p>[https://www.adenna.com Adenna]</p>
          <p>[https://www.farmcity.co.za/ Farmcity]</p>
          <p>[https://www.crazystore.co.za/ Crazystore]</p>
     </div>
     </div>
   </div>
   </div>
   <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
   <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h3 class="title-bg">References</h3>
       <h1 class="title-bg">References</h1>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
           <p>Espasandín-Arias, M., & Goossens, A. (2014). Natural rubber gloves might not protect against skin penetration of methylisothiazolinone. Contact Dermatitis, 70(4), 249-251. doi:10.1111/cod.12221</p>
           <p>1. Barberi, P. (2002). Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Research, 42, 177–193. Retrieved from http://journals2.scholarsportal.info.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/pdf/00431737/v42i0003/177_wmioaawatri.xml
          <p>European Commission For The Control Of Foot-And-Mouth Disease. Suggested FMD PPE guidelines - Food and Agriculture, (2016)  
<p>2. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2007). Labour saving technologies and practices: Row planting, hand seeders and planters.</p>
          Food and Agriculture Organization. Rural women in household production: Increasing contributions and persisting drudgery. (2016).
<p>3. Johansen, C., Haque, M. E., Bell, R. W., Thierfelder, C., & Esdaile, R. J. (2012). Conservation agriculture for small holder rainfed farming: Opportunities and constraints of new mechanized seeding systems. Field Crops Research. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.026</p>
          </p>
<p>4. Maddonni, G. A., & Martinez-Bercovich, J. (2014). Row Spacing, Landscape Position, and Maize Grain Yield. International Journal of Agronomy. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T002&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&currentPosition=55&docId=GALE%7CA417738017&docType=Article&sort=RELEVANCE&contentSegment=&prodId</p>
          <p>Furlong, M., Tanner, C. M., Goldman, S. M., Bhudhikanok, G. S., Blair, A., Chade, A., . . . Kamel, F. (2015). Protective glove use and hygiene habits modify the associations of specific pesticides with Parkinson's disease. Environment International, 75, 144-150. doi:10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.002</p>
<p>5. Singels, A., & Smit, M. A. (2009). Sugarcane response to row spacing-induced competition for light. Field Crops Research, 113, 149–155. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.015</p>
          <p>Keeble, V. B., Correll, L., & Ehrich, M. (1996). Effect of Laundering on Ability of Glove Fabrics to Decrease the Penetration of Organophosphate Insecticides Through in vitro Epidermal Systems. J. Appl. Toxicol. Journal of Applied Toxicology, 16(5), 401-406. doi:10.1002/(sici)1099-1263(199609)16:53.3.co;2-6</p>
<p>6. Tesfaye, K., Walker, S., & Tsubo, M. (2006). Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment. Europ. J. Agronomy, 25, 60–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.04.014</p>
          <p>Kim, J., Kim, J., Cha, E., Ko, Y., Kim, D., & Lee, W. (2013). Work-Related Risk Factors by Severity for Acute Pesticide Poisoning Among Male Farmers in South Korea. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(3), 1100-1112. doi:10.3390/ijerph10031100</p>
<p>7. Wiyo, K. A., Kasomekera, Z. M., & Feyen, J. (1999). Variability in ridge and furrow size and shape and maize population density on small subsistence farms in Malawi. Soil & Tillage Research, 51, 113–119. Retrieved from http://journals2.scholarsportal.info.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/pdf/01671987/v51i1-2/113_virafsossfim.xml</p>
          <p>Melco, M. (2016). Gardening Gloves. Retrieved from [http://garden.lovetoknow.com/wiki/Gardening_Gloves Garden Lovetoknow]</p>
          <p>Schaffner, A. D. (2013). Minimizing Surgical Skin Incision Scars with a Latex Surgical Glove. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery, 37(2), 463-463. doi:10.1007/s00266-013-0071-y</p>
     </div>
     </div>
   </div>
   </div>

Latest revision as of 11:23, 13 January 2026

Img4 1.jpeg

Related video(s): Grow row by row (Source: Access Agriculture)

https://www.accessagriculture.org/grow-row-row?cat_id=1499

Suggested citation for this chapter.

Radcliffe,K. (2022) Sowing seeds in rows (line sowing). In Farmpedia, The Encyclopedia for Small Scale Farmers. Editor, M.N. Raizada, University of Guelph, Canada. http://www.farmpedia.org

Introduction

Introduction: Traditionally, subsistence farmers have utilized a method known as broadcasting to sow seeds. Generally, broadcasting involves manually dispersing seeds throughout the field by throwing handfuls over the soil. In order for farmers to obtain a substantial yield with broadcasting, seeds must be sown at a relatively high density. Since the seeds were dispersed on the soil surface, some seeds could be lost to birds or field run-off during rainstorms (Johansen, Haque, Bell, Thierfelder, & Esdaile, 2012). Alternatively, line sowing involves sowing seeds in uniform rows either manually or with machinery (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). This sowing method allows for higher yields due to reduced plant competition for sunlight, water, and nutrients. Additionally, sowing seeds in rows allows for enhanced weed and pest management since farmers can more easily move through the field to removed weeds and monitor crops for pests or disease (Barberi, 2002).

Benefits of Line Seeding

Sunlight, water, and nutrients are all essential components to the development and growth of plants. Plants absorb sunlight using the photo pigments in their leaves, which is then converted into energy for growth (Maddonni & Martinez-Bercovich, 2014). Depending on the plant species the efficiency of this conversion process differs slightly (Tesfaye, Walker, & Tsubo, 2006). When plants become too crowded, competition for access to sunlight, nutrients, and water ensues.

Unfortunately, many farmers sow their crop seeds at a higher density than what is recommended by their local extension services resulting in increased levels of plant stress and the subsequent reduction in crop yields (Wiyo, Kasomekera, & Feyen, 1999). Access to sunlight plays a major role in determining crop yield as it is essential to plant growth. A study conducted by Maddonni and Martinez-Bercovich found that maize grain yield is primarily determined by kernel number per unit land, which is positively correlated with the amount of photo synthetically active radiation intercepted by the leaves (2014). Plants, which emerge earlier, will have competitive advantage in this situation, surpassing the others in growth and eventually blocking the surrounding plants access to sunlight (Maddonni & Martinez-Bercovich, 2014). The larger the size of the leaf and the shorter the period required for leaf development will allow for greater radiation interception. Singels and Smit conducted research on sugarcane and row spacing, finding that leaf development is affected by row spacing (2009). The higher rates of leaf development occurred in the wider rows, indicating that plants require adequate space to access sunlight and nutrients required for growth (Singels & Smit, 2009). Similarly, plants, which are able to develop their root systems earlier, will have greater success in obtaining the scarce water and nutrients vital for growth (Barberi, 2002). The practice of sowing seeds in lines allows for optimum sunlight exposure, and soil water utilization. Maddonni and Martinez-Bercovich discovered that grain yield reductions were most prevalent in fields where crops were planted in higher densities (2014). In addition, broadcasting tends to require a higher seed input to compensate for losses, making line sowing a more beneficial choice when seed prices are high.

Sowing in rows enables farmers to monitor their crops for signs of pests or pathogens and have greater access to weeds. This aspect is extremely important as an unnoticed or untreated pest or pathogen could wipe out yields leaving the farmer with no income or food for that season. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), cowpea (Vignaungviculata L.), chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.), and pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) are major grain legumes grown in semi-arid regions (Tesfaye et al., 2006). These legumes are a primary source of dietary protein and income for subsistence farmers. The dry matter production and subsequent yield has been found to be highly associated with the fraction of PAR intercepted by the plant (Tesfaye et al., 2006). Studies conducted by Barberi using pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan L.) found that an inter-row distance of 40-50 centimetres allowed for optimal grain yields per unit and hoeing between rows (2001).

How to Practice

A simple method that can be employed to sow seeds in rows involves the use of string and wood stakes. Depending on the region and species being planted row spacing will vary. Measuring the dimensions of the field is recommended to ensure uniform spacing between rows (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). To ensure the rows are straight, tie the string to two wood stakes and place the stakes at either end of the field making sure that the string is tight. The string acts to mark where the rows will be planted, acting as a visual guide for the sowing process. The seeds can either be dribbled into the furrows and covered over or put into a hole, which is created using a hoe (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). The method involving the use of a hoe to dig holes is typically used for larger crops, which require greater spacing between crops (Food and Agriculture Organization, 2007). Mechanized tools are also available to farmers at a relatively low cost. Jab planters enable the farmer to plant seeds into untilled soil, eliminating the labours tasks of digging holes and bending down to plant the seeds (Johansen et al., 2012). However, using this tool can bring challenges such as the tip becoming clogged with soil, taking away from its intended efficiency (Johansen et al., 2012). In order for line sowing to be most beneficial it must be employed with a corresponding weed suppression strategy such as a cover crop or herbicide treatment.

Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmers

Click on the image to access a higher resolution image as well as lessons adapted for different geographic regions.

For the South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4.pdf

For the East/South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4e.s.a.pdf

For the Sub-Saharan Africa/Caribbean version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4subsaharan_africa_carribean.pdf

For the Latin-America version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4latin_america.pdf

For North Africa And Middle East version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 2.4:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/2.4n._africa_middleeast.pdf

Source: MN Raizada and LJ Smith (2016) A Picture Book of Best Practices for Subsistence Farmers. eBook, University of Guelph Sustainable Agriculture Kit (SAK) Project, June 2016, Guelph, Canada.

Challenges

Although planting seeds in rows is beneficial for yield levels it is also considerably time consuming. If farmers use manual line sowing methods they will have to prepare the field for sowing with a hoe before they can distribute the seeds. Compared to broadcasting seeds, line sowing requires significantly more time and labour, which may deter farmers from adopting it into their practices. This especially true in the case of lower value crops. However, a farmer may be more inclined to adopt line-sowing practices for higher value cash crops. For instance, farmers will almost always adopt line-sowing practices in the case of many fruits and vegetables, which are high in labour, value, input, and susceptible to pests and disease. Whereas, low value cereals and legumes are more likely to be broadcasted since the perceived benefit of adopting line sowing is not as high as in fruits and vegetables. Broadcasting seeds at higher densities can also be beneficial in suppressing weed populations. If a farmer does not have the time or labour available to keep up with the weeding of their fields broadcasting may be a better option. The field being used by a farmer is not always located near their house, limiting access and time available for weeding making broadcasting more attractive. Line sowing permits spaces in-between the rows of crops in which weeds can grow, where as, broadcasting leaves little space for weeds to develop. Furthermore, broadcasting can be successful in muddy soils, whereas, line sowing, which may require machinery or a jab planter, tends to be problematic. Depending on the land, line sowing may require both the jab planter and plough to loosen the soil first, whereas, broadcasting may need no field preparation. When deciding between line sowing and broadcasting it is very important to consider the crops being grown. Some crops can be quite successful in mixed broadcasting, while other such as corn struggle due to shading.

References

1. Barberi, P. (2002). Weed management in organic agriculture: are we addressing the right issues? Weed Research, 42, 177–193. Retrieved from http://journals2.scholarsportal.info.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/pdf/00431737/v42i0003/177_wmioaawatri.xml

2. Food and Agriculture Organization. (2007). Labour saving technologies and practices: Row planting, hand seeders and planters.

3. Johansen, C., Haque, M. E., Bell, R. W., Thierfelder, C., & Esdaile, R. J. (2012). Conservation agriculture for small holder rainfed farming: Opportunities and constraints of new mechanized seeding systems. Field Crops Research. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2011.11.026

4. Maddonni, G. A., & Martinez-Bercovich, J. (2014). Row Spacing, Landscape Position, and Maize Grain Yield. International Journal of Agronomy. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/ps/retrieve.do?tabID=T002&resultListType=RESULT_LIST&searchResultsType=SingleTab&searchType=AdvancedSearchForm&currentPosition=55&docId=GALE%7CA417738017&docType=Article&sort=RELEVANCE&contentSegment=&prodId

5. Singels, A., & Smit, M. A. (2009). Sugarcane response to row spacing-induced competition for light. Field Crops Research, 113, 149–155. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2009.04.015

6. Tesfaye, K., Walker, S., & Tsubo, M. (2006). Radiation interception and radiation use efficiency of three grain legumes under water deficit conditions in a semi-arid environment. Europ. J. Agronomy, 25, 60–70. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2006.04.014

7. Wiyo, K. A., Kasomekera, Z. M., & Feyen, J. (1999). Variability in ridge and furrow size and shape and maize population density on small subsistence farms in Malawi. Soil & Tillage Research, 51, 113–119. Retrieved from http://journals2.scholarsportal.info.subzero.lib.uoguelph.ca/pdf/01671987/v51i1-2/113_virafsossfim.xml