Template:Chapters 7.8: Difference between revisions

From Farmpedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
No edit summary
 
(4 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
<div>
<div>
  <div class="title"><h1>7.8 - a,b Manure tea field spraying and seed application</h1><br><h3 class="ch-owner">Gryphon Therault-Loubier, University of Guelph, Canada</h3></div>
  <div class="title"><h3>7.8 - Manure tea field spraying and seed application</h3><br><h3 class="ch-owner">Nick Moroz, University of Guelph, Canada</h3></div>
<div class="hero-img-2">
[[File:4.jpg|300px]]
<p>Suggested citation for this chapter.</p>
<p>Moroz,N. (2022) Manure tea field spraying and seed application. In Farmpedia, The Encyclopedia for Small Scale Farmers. Editor, M.N. Raizada, University of Guelph, Canada. http://www.farmpedia.org</p>
</div>
  <div class="ch-navber" style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between;">
  <div class="ch-navber" style="display: flex; justify-content: space-between;">
  <div class="center-side" style="max-width: 100%;margin-right: 3%;">
  <div class="center-side" style="max-width: 100%;margin-right: 3%;">
       <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
       <h3 class="title-bg">Introduction</h3>
       <h1 class="title-bg">Compost “Teas” can Prevent Disease</h1>
         <div class="cont-bg">
         <div class="cont-bg">
           <p>Grafting is a horticultural technique that holds much promise for farmers around the world. To graft, a branch of a tree or shoot of a plant is cut (“scion”) and joined onto a decapitated rootstock (“rootstock”). In a successful graft, the vascular tissues of the scion and rootstock will fuse together. With trees or perennials, a primary benefit of grafting is that it permits rapid propagation of a shoot that has desirable characteristics (e.g. desirable fruits) by taking advantage of an already established root system. Grafting allows mixing and matching of traits from different cultivars (e.g. rootstock that is disease resistant to a shoot that bears desirable fruits). Grafting can usually only take place between two plants of the same genetic family. For instance, successful grafting can occur between plants of the Solanaceae family which includes tomatoes, eggplants, potatoes and tobacco (Kudo, 2007).  Remarkably, grafts can be successful not only within the same species (e.g. tomato with tomato) but also between species (e.g. tomato with eggplant).</p>
           <p>Compost teas - an umbrella term that includes manure teas - are preventative measures: they reduce the possibility of plant infection from occurring. Preventative measures contrast with curative measures, with the latter aiming to address plant diseases as they occur within a field. Although the benefits of preventatives measure are not directly seen, these measures can save money and resources over time. Preventative measures can decrease the probability of pathogenesis in a field, reducing the need for insecticides to control plant epidemics that could have been controlled by preventative treatment in the first place.</p>


          <p>One of the main reasons that a plant would be grafted would be out of a desire to maintain certain characteristics of a plant, such as in a fruit tree that would otherwise produce asexually. The offspring of an apple tree, for instance, are not very likely to mimic the parent in terms of flavor, texture. By grafting a branch of the tree with the desired fruit onto a rootstock, the fruit of the resultant tree will be highly similar to those of the parent, and allow for predictable cultivation of specific ‘varieties’ at a large scale.</p>


          <p>Grafting is an effective way to not only replicate traits that are culinary, but also agricultural traits such as drought tolerance, cold tolerance, and salinity tolerance, amongst others. For example, rootstock of a plant may have good tolerance to the cold, but may produce less fruit than another variety. When the ‘scion’ of the highly productive plant is placed on the ‘rootstock’ of the cold hardy plant, the plant will often survive and become both cold tolerant and highly productive (Mudge, 2009). </p>
<p>Compost tea may reduce the need for multiple field applications of fungicides or bactericides later in the growing season. Aggravated use of pesticides is often damaging to the local environment and poses a health hazard to farmers using these applications without advanced safety equipment. Subsistence farmers interested in conserving crop health can consider compost teas as a safe preventative measure, although these teas are generally considered to be less effective than commercial pesticides.</p>


          <p>Grafting allows for individual fruit farmers to respond to market changes faster than if they were to plant a young tree, since fruit will be produced quicker from the combination of mature rootstock and scion than from a younger tree (Hart, 2005). Consequently, there remains a stronger possibility that this individual will have access to larger markets and higher asking prices for in-demand fruits and vegetables. </p>
</div>
  </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Compost or Manure “Tea” Mechanism to Reducing Pathogenesis </h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>Compost or manure “teas” - composed of compost, manures, and other organic materials - are organic approaches to reducing pathogens, most notably fungi and bacteria. There are multiple beneficial mechanisms that allow these teas to reduce pathogenesis of crops.
First, compost teas contain a variety of beneficial microbes in the compost or manure that outcompete pathogenic microbes for nutrients secreted by plants in both the roots and leaves (Ingham & Alms, 2003; Scheuerell, 2004). Plant exudates, both from roots and leaves, help grow disease-suppressing bacteria and fungi in the compost tea, fighting off pathogens (Ingham & Alms, 2003; Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Unfortunately pesticides and inorganic fertilizers can kill the beneficial microbes, leaving plant exudates for the disease causing microbes (Ingham & Alms, 2003).</p>
<p>Second, compost teas contain soluble nutrients that feed beneficial microbes within the teas themselves and also feed the plants after application of the “tea” (Ingham & Alms, 2003; Scheuerell, 2004). High nutrient concentrations promote beneficial microbe growth, plant resiliency, and increase retention of nutrients in the soil around the plants, reducing fertilizer demands (Ingham & Alms, 2003). Because of these mechanisms, compost teas are often sprayed onto the soil or used as a leaf spray (foliar).</p>
</div>
  </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Methods of Compost Tea Production and Application </h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>Compost tea is produced by mixing compost (or manure in manure teas) with water and culturing for a defined period (Scheuerell, 2004). There are two major methods for producing these teas: actively aerating (aerated compost tea, ACT) or not (non-aerated compost tea, NCT) (Scheuerell, 2004). Finally, teas are made with or without additives that are intended to increase microbial population densities during production (Scheuerell, 2004). These are a number of other parameters besides the role of aeration that impact compost tea production and their suppressive properties (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). These include choice of compost feedstock, compost age, water ratio, fermentation time, added nutrients, temperature and pH, and these are outlined in table 1 (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Each of these properties influences the suppressive capabilities of compost teas (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Simple procedures/recipes can be found on wikihow (http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Manure-Tea).</p>
<p>A variety of parameters to consider for application are dilution ratio, equipment, timing, and rates of application (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Application to soils and/or plants can be done with spray equipment and all types of irrigation systems, if useful (Steven J. Scheuerell). The application system determines the need for filtering compost tea and it should be noted that some filters could reduce microbial populations (Scheuerell, 2004). It should be noted that the research reflects that there is no one ideal compost tea and application factor for all host-pathogen systems (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002.</p>
[[File:capture 110.JPG]]
<P><B>In summary</b>, these are several methods for producing compost or manure teas to choose from, depending on the scale of production and available financial resources for buying brewing equipment or constructing a homemade brewer (ATTRA, 1998). Methods include the Bucket-Bubbler, Tough, and Commercial Tea Brewer Methods (ATTRA, 1998). Two methods, found at ATTRA, are listed here and can be further researched if needed at ATTRA (ATTRA, 1998).
<P><B>First, the Bucket-Fermentation Method:</b> compost tea is made by immersing a burlap sack filled with compost into a tank with occasional stirring for 7-10 days, resulting in a compost water extract rather than a “brewed” compost tea (ATTRA, 1998). This is a hundreds of years old method for making basic watery compost tea (ATTRA, 1998).</P> 
<P><P><B>Second, the Commercial Tea Brewers:</b> These brewers contain a compost leachate basket with drainage holes placed in a tank with water and microbial food sources (ATTRA, 1998). A pump also supplies oxygen to aerate the compost tea while brewing in the tank (ATTRA, 1998). Although this method may be too expensive for a subsistence farmer, it may be affordable for a community.</P>
</div>
  </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Aerated and Non-aerated Compost Tea</h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>As mentioned, the two major methods for producing compost teas are aerated compost tea (ACT) or non-aerated compost tea (NCT). This parameter is especially important because producing compost tea with or without aeration and nutrient additives was shown to affect total bacterial population counts as well as bacterial metabolically activity (Scheuerell, 2004). The main distinction between NCT and ACT is that NCT uses greater quantities of compost than ACT, usually without separate nutrient additives, and can be produced from several days to several weeks (Scheuerell, 2004). In contrast, ACT is aerated and uses composts, water, and nutrient additives to significantly increase microbial populations over a 12-36 hour period (Scheuerell, 2004). Compost is supplied aeration through technologies such as an aquarium pump (Lanthier & Advising, 2007). The higher oxygen supply stimulates growth of aerobic microbe populations that assist in compost tea disease suppression and nutrient supply, and these microbes may not survive low oxygen conditions (Lanthier & Advising, 2007).</p>
<p>Most research has focused on the plant disease control properties of compost tea, with most studies pointing to the efficacy of NCT as compared to ACT (Scheuerell, 2004). This review paper outlines the number of NCT studies that showed disease suppressive properties compared to ACT studies (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002).</p>
</div>
  </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Case Studies</h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>There are multiple examples in the literature to support the claims that both NCT and ACT can be effective in disease suppression (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002; Martin, 2014; Haggag & Saber, 2007; Al-Dahmani, Abbasi, Miller, & Hoitink, 2003). Due to the volume of studies that reflect this, examples are outlined in table 2. Supposedly, like NCT, increasing the populations of both the total and active bacteria in ACT will generally lead to heightened plant disease suppression (Scheuerell, 2004). In one study, NCT used for seed sterilization prevented pea seeds from “damping-off” caused by the microbe Pythium ultimum and also helped the plant to grow after germination  (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Although less research has been conducted on soil-borne disease suppression (as compared to foliar disease suppression) with compost teas, this is an often-practiced technique used by organic farmers (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002</p>
[[File:capture 112.JPG]]
</div>
  </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Critical Analysis and Summary</h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>Use and application of compost teas in practice are rapidly expanding and outpacing the capacity for traditional scientific research to document the effects of these teas (Scheuerell, 2004). As with many biotechnologies, compost teas are not the single solution to complex problems, such as unsustainable farming, and often their efficacy is limited compared to commercial pesticides (Scheuerell, 2004). However, these teas may be integrated into organic farming systems as a carrier of plant nutrients and beneficial microbes to manage diseases, especially when pesticides use is not a possible solution. Subsistence farmers should be informed of how compost teas may impact their production systems (Scheuerell, 2004)</p>
<p>As some microbes in manure teas can be human pathogens, these “teas” must be used with caution. Microbes in compost teas are thought to be the most importance factor assisting in plant disease suppression despite a limited understanding of the microbes that provide this protection (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). This limit in knowledge, along with a lack of reporting standards, likely contributes to the variability in compost tea research findings (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002).</p>
</div>
  </div>
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmers</h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
[[Image:8.8a image.jpg|thumb|centre|Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmer|Click on the image to access a higher resolution image as well as lessons adapted for different geographic regions.]]</p>
[[Image:8.8b image.jpg|thumb|centre|Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmer|Click on the image to access a higher resolution image as well as lessons adapted for different geographic regions.]]</p>
<p><i>For the South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8a_south_asian.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8b_south_asian.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the East/South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8ae.s.a.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the East/South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8be.s.a.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the Sub-Saharan Africa/Caribbean version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8asubsaharan_africa_carribean.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the Sub-Saharan Africa/Caribbean version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8bsubsaharan_africa_carribean.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the Latin-America version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8alatin_america.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For the Latin-America version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8blatin_america.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For North Africa And Middle East version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson Chapter 5. 7.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/7.8_a_n._africa_middleeast-1.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>For North Africa And Middle East version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson Chapter 5. 7.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/7.8_b_n._africa_middleeast-2.pdf</i></p>
<p><i>Source: MN Raizada and LJ Smith (2016) A Picture Book of Best Practices for Subsistence Farmers:  eBook, University of Guelph Sustainable Agriculture Kit (SAK) Project, June 2016, Guelph, Canada. Available online at: www.SAKBooks.com</i></p>
</div>
  </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">Resources Moving Forward</h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>ATTRA Sustainable Agriculture link is a quick guide to a variety of compost tea production systems. Retrieved from: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/viewhtml.php?id=125</p>


<p>Some trees, such as the Baobob tree from the Sahel countries of Africa, are grafted quite easily, with success rates ranging from 80-95% (Maranz, 2008). However, this is not consistent across all species, and does not account for the ‘learning curve’ in practicing proper technique. Maranz (2008) notes that ‘exotic’ varieties of Baobob (those from other Sahel countries) have superior nutritional benefits, and determines that grafting represents an interesting possibility for developing a market for the new varieties, since the local variety has far superior basal diameter, tree height, and resistance to termites. Assah (2011) details the possibility of an emerging market for three novel Alanblackia species in Africa for its nutritive, medicinal, cosmetic, and detergent properties. These species could be grafted onto locally available rootstock for local production to take place. Mudge (2009) details the grafting of Ceara rubber tree onto a cassava rootstock, for the purpose of invigorating the rootstock. The resulting yield of cassava tubers was increased by 30-100% depending on the combination of species. </p>
<p>ATTRA notes on compost teas. Retrieved from: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=125 </p>


    </div>
<p>Notes for compost teas and other pathogen treatments seen here: http://www.growseed.org/seedtreatments.html</p>
  </div>


  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
<p>Compost Tea: Principles and Prospects For Plant Disease Control: good literature on ACT and NCT with tables. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1065657X.2002.10702095</p>
      <h3 class="title-bg">Critical analysis</h3>
        <div class="cont-bg">
          <p>Grafting at a large scale is labour intensive, and does require some training. The success rate of grafting is highly variable depending on species; research should be performed on the specific species to determine average success rates, or a test plot should be initiated (Mudge, 2009).
There is an ongoing debate about the possibility of the transference of genetic material from scion to rootstock and how this affects the ‘heritage’ of traditional varieties (Mudge, 2009).</p>
    </div>
  </div>


  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
<p>Outline of compost teas titled: Compost tea and its impact on plant diseases. Retrieved from: http://crophealth.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CropHealthcom-Sustainable-Compost-Tea-and-plant-diseases-2007-BCOrganicGrower-COABC.pdf</p>
      <h3 style="background: #FBB03B;padding: 15px;font-weight: 600;color: #000;font-size: 22px;margin:unset;text-align:center;">Practical tips</h3>
        <div style="background: #FFD8A4;padding: 15px;font-weight: 400;color: #212529;font-size: 16px;margin:unset;line-height: 1.5;">
          <p>The University of Minnesota has a comprehensive manual on grafting, including timing, species selection, and materials needed. </p>
          <p>The University of Arizona publishes free ‘how-to’ videos on vegetable grafting. While limited to tomatoes, curcubits and eggplants, many of the principles remain the same. </p>
     </div>
     </div>
   </div>
   </div>
<div style="margin-top: 30px;">
      <h1 class="title-bg">References</h1>
        <div class="cont-bg">
          <p>1. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas, ATTRA. (1998). Notes on Compost Teas. National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT). Retrieved from: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/viewhtml.php?id=125</p>
   
   
  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
<p>2. Al-Dahmani, J. H., Abbasi, P. A., Miller, S. A., & Hoitink, H. A. (2003). Suppression of bacterial spot of tomato with foliar sprays of compost extracts under greenhouse and field conditions. Plant disease, 87(8), 913-919.</p>
      <h3 class="title-bg">Usefull Images</h3>
 
        <div class="cont-bg">
<p>3. Gea, F. J., Navarro, M. J., & Tello, J. C. (2009). Potential application of compost teas of agricultural wastes in the control of the mushroom pathogen Verticillium fungicola. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 116(6), 271-273.</p>
            <div class="row" style="display:flex; justify-content: space-between;padding:35px 25px;">
 
              <div class="column" style="max-width: 28%;">
<p>4. Haggag, W. M., & Saber, M. S. M. (2007). Suppression of early blight on tomato and purple blight on onion by foliar sprays of aerated and non-aerated compost teas. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 5(2), 302.</p>
                <div class="card">
                  <div class="fakeimg fakeimg-use">[[File:1.jpg]]</div>
                </div>
              </div>


              <div class="column" style="max-width: 28%;">
<p>5. Ingham, E., & Alms, M. (2003). Compost tea. Soil Foodweb Incorporated.</p>
                <div class="card">
                  <div class="fakeimg fakeimg-use">[[File:2.jpg]]</div>
                </div>
              </div>


              <div class="column" style="max-width: 28%;">
<p>6. Lanthier, M., & Advising, C. (2007). Compost tea and its impact on plant diseases. BC Organic Grower, 10(2), 8-11.</p>
                <div class="card">
                  <div class="fakeimg fakeimg-use">[[File:3.jpg]]</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>


            <div class="row" style="display:flex; justify-content: space-between;padding:35px 25px;">
<p>7. Martin, C. C. S. (2014). Potential of compost tea for suppressing plant diseases. CAB Rev, 9(32), 1-12.</p>
              <div class="column" style="max-width: 28%;">
                <div class="card">
                  <div class="fakeimg fakeimg-use">[[File:4.jpg]]</div>
                </div>
              </div>


              <div class="column" style="max-width: 28%;">
<p>8. Scheuerell, S., & Mahaffee, W. (2002). Compost tea: principles and prospects for plant disease control. Compost Science & Utilization, 10(4), 313-338.</p>
                <div class="card">
                  <div class="fakeimg fakeimg-use">[[File:5.jpg]]</div>
                </div>
              </div>


              <div class="column" style="max-width: 28%;">
<p>9. Scheuerell, S. J. (2004, September). Compost tea production practices, microbial properties, and plant disease suppression. In International Conference on Soil and Compost Eco-Biology</p>
                <div class="card">
                  <div class="fakeimg fakeimg-use">[[File:6.jpg]]</div>
                </div>
              </div>
            </div>
        </div>
    </div>  


  <div style="margin-top: 30px;">
    </div>
      <h3 class="title-bg">References</h3>
  </div>
        <div class="cont-bg">
  </div>
          <p>Asaah, E., Tchoundjeu, Z., Ngahane, W., Tsobeng, A., Kouodiekong, L., Jamnadass, R., & Simons, A. (2011). Allanblackia floribunda: A new oil tree crop for africa: Amenability to grafting. New Forests, 41(3), 389-398.
</div>
Hart, T., & Burgess, R. (2005). Grafting keeps farmer in the export market. Appropriate Technology, 32(3), 13-14. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/200037126?accountid=11233
</div>
Kudo,  & Harada, T. (2007). A graft-transmissible RNA from tomato rootstock changes leaf morphology of potato scion. HortScience : A Publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science., 42(2), 225-226.
Maranz, S., Niang, A., Kalinganire, A., Konaté, D., & Kaya, B. (2008). Potential to harness superior nutritional qualities of exotic baobabs if local adaptation can be conferred through grafting. Agroforestry Systems, 72(3), 231-239.
Mudge, K., Janick, J., Scofield, S., & Goldschmidt, E. E. (2009). A history of grafting. Horticultural Reviews.,437-493. </p>

Latest revision as of 18:09, 11 December 2023

4.jpg

Suggested citation for this chapter.

Moroz,N. (2022) Manure tea field spraying and seed application. In Farmpedia, The Encyclopedia for Small Scale Farmers. Editor, M.N. Raizada, University of Guelph, Canada. http://www.farmpedia.org

Compost “Teas” can Prevent Disease

Compost teas - an umbrella term that includes manure teas - are preventative measures: they reduce the possibility of plant infection from occurring. Preventative measures contrast with curative measures, with the latter aiming to address plant diseases as they occur within a field. Although the benefits of preventatives measure are not directly seen, these measures can save money and resources over time. Preventative measures can decrease the probability of pathogenesis in a field, reducing the need for insecticides to control plant epidemics that could have been controlled by preventative treatment in the first place.


Compost tea may reduce the need for multiple field applications of fungicides or bactericides later in the growing season. Aggravated use of pesticides is often damaging to the local environment and poses a health hazard to farmers using these applications without advanced safety equipment. Subsistence farmers interested in conserving crop health can consider compost teas as a safe preventative measure, although these teas are generally considered to be less effective than commercial pesticides.

Compost or Manure “Tea” Mechanism to Reducing Pathogenesis

Compost or manure “teas” - composed of compost, manures, and other organic materials - are organic approaches to reducing pathogens, most notably fungi and bacteria. There are multiple beneficial mechanisms that allow these teas to reduce pathogenesis of crops. First, compost teas contain a variety of beneficial microbes in the compost or manure that outcompete pathogenic microbes for nutrients secreted by plants in both the roots and leaves (Ingham & Alms, 2003; Scheuerell, 2004). Plant exudates, both from roots and leaves, help grow disease-suppressing bacteria and fungi in the compost tea, fighting off pathogens (Ingham & Alms, 2003; Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Unfortunately pesticides and inorganic fertilizers can kill the beneficial microbes, leaving plant exudates for the disease causing microbes (Ingham & Alms, 2003).

Second, compost teas contain soluble nutrients that feed beneficial microbes within the teas themselves and also feed the plants after application of the “tea” (Ingham & Alms, 2003; Scheuerell, 2004). High nutrient concentrations promote beneficial microbe growth, plant resiliency, and increase retention of nutrients in the soil around the plants, reducing fertilizer demands (Ingham & Alms, 2003). Because of these mechanisms, compost teas are often sprayed onto the soil or used as a leaf spray (foliar).

Methods of Compost Tea Production and Application

Compost tea is produced by mixing compost (or manure in manure teas) with water and culturing for a defined period (Scheuerell, 2004). There are two major methods for producing these teas: actively aerating (aerated compost tea, ACT) or not (non-aerated compost tea, NCT) (Scheuerell, 2004). Finally, teas are made with or without additives that are intended to increase microbial population densities during production (Scheuerell, 2004). These are a number of other parameters besides the role of aeration that impact compost tea production and their suppressive properties (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). These include choice of compost feedstock, compost age, water ratio, fermentation time, added nutrients, temperature and pH, and these are outlined in table 1 (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Each of these properties influences the suppressive capabilities of compost teas (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Simple procedures/recipes can be found on wikihow (http://www.wikihow.com/Make-Manure-Tea).

A variety of parameters to consider for application are dilution ratio, equipment, timing, and rates of application (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Application to soils and/or plants can be done with spray equipment and all types of irrigation systems, if useful (Steven J. Scheuerell). The application system determines the need for filtering compost tea and it should be noted that some filters could reduce microbial populations (Scheuerell, 2004). It should be noted that the research reflects that there is no one ideal compost tea and application factor for all host-pathogen systems (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002.

Capture 110.JPG

In summary, these are several methods for producing compost or manure teas to choose from, depending on the scale of production and available financial resources for buying brewing equipment or constructing a homemade brewer (ATTRA, 1998). Methods include the Bucket-Bubbler, Tough, and Commercial Tea Brewer Methods (ATTRA, 1998). Two methods, found at ATTRA, are listed here and can be further researched if needed at ATTRA (ATTRA, 1998).

First, the Bucket-Fermentation Method: compost tea is made by immersing a burlap sack filled with compost into a tank with occasional stirring for 7-10 days, resulting in a compost water extract rather than a “brewed” compost tea (ATTRA, 1998). This is a hundreds of years old method for making basic watery compost tea (ATTRA, 1998).

Second, the Commercial Tea Brewers: These brewers contain a compost leachate basket with drainage holes placed in a tank with water and microbial food sources (ATTRA, 1998). A pump also supplies oxygen to aerate the compost tea while brewing in the tank (ATTRA, 1998). Although this method may be too expensive for a subsistence farmer, it may be affordable for a community.

Aerated and Non-aerated Compost Tea

As mentioned, the two major methods for producing compost teas are aerated compost tea (ACT) or non-aerated compost tea (NCT). This parameter is especially important because producing compost tea with or without aeration and nutrient additives was shown to affect total bacterial population counts as well as bacterial metabolically activity (Scheuerell, 2004). The main distinction between NCT and ACT is that NCT uses greater quantities of compost than ACT, usually without separate nutrient additives, and can be produced from several days to several weeks (Scheuerell, 2004). In contrast, ACT is aerated and uses composts, water, and nutrient additives to significantly increase microbial populations over a 12-36 hour period (Scheuerell, 2004). Compost is supplied aeration through technologies such as an aquarium pump (Lanthier & Advising, 2007). The higher oxygen supply stimulates growth of aerobic microbe populations that assist in compost tea disease suppression and nutrient supply, and these microbes may not survive low oxygen conditions (Lanthier & Advising, 2007).

Most research has focused on the plant disease control properties of compost tea, with most studies pointing to the efficacy of NCT as compared to ACT (Scheuerell, 2004). This review paper outlines the number of NCT studies that showed disease suppressive properties compared to ACT studies (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002).

Case Studies

There are multiple examples in the literature to support the claims that both NCT and ACT can be effective in disease suppression (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002; Martin, 2014; Haggag & Saber, 2007; Al-Dahmani, Abbasi, Miller, & Hoitink, 2003). Due to the volume of studies that reflect this, examples are outlined in table 2. Supposedly, like NCT, increasing the populations of both the total and active bacteria in ACT will generally lead to heightened plant disease suppression (Scheuerell, 2004). In one study, NCT used for seed sterilization prevented pea seeds from “damping-off” caused by the microbe Pythium ultimum and also helped the plant to grow after germination (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). Although less research has been conducted on soil-borne disease suppression (as compared to foliar disease suppression) with compost teas, this is an often-practiced technique used by organic farmers (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002

Capture 112.JPG

Critical Analysis and Summary

Use and application of compost teas in practice are rapidly expanding and outpacing the capacity for traditional scientific research to document the effects of these teas (Scheuerell, 2004). As with many biotechnologies, compost teas are not the single solution to complex problems, such as unsustainable farming, and often their efficacy is limited compared to commercial pesticides (Scheuerell, 2004). However, these teas may be integrated into organic farming systems as a carrier of plant nutrients and beneficial microbes to manage diseases, especially when pesticides use is not a possible solution. Subsistence farmers should be informed of how compost teas may impact their production systems (Scheuerell, 2004)

As some microbes in manure teas can be human pathogens, these “teas” must be used with caution. Microbes in compost teas are thought to be the most importance factor assisting in plant disease suppression despite a limited understanding of the microbes that provide this protection (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002). This limit in knowledge, along with a lack of reporting standards, likely contributes to the variability in compost tea research findings (Scheuerell & Mahaffee, 2002).

Picture Based Lesson to Train Farmers

Click on the image to access a higher resolution image as well as lessons adapted for different geographic regions.

Click on the image to access a higher resolution image as well as lessons adapted for different geographic regions.

For the South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8a_south_asian.pdf

For the South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8b_south_asian.pdf

For the East/South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8ae.s.a.pdf

For the East/South Asian version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8be.s.a.pdf

For the Sub-Saharan Africa/Caribbean version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8asubsaharan_africa_carribean.pdf

For the Sub-Saharan Africa/Caribbean version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8bsubsaharan_africa_carribean.pdf

For the Latin-America version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8alatin_america.pdf

For the Latin-America version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson 8.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/8.8blatin_america.pdf

For North Africa And Middle East version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson Chapter 5. 7.8a:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/7.8_a_n._africa_middleeast-1.pdf

For North Africa And Middle East version (pictures only, text for you to insert), click this link for lesson Chapter 5. 7.8b:http://www.sakbooks.com/uploads/8/1/5/7/81574912/7.8_b_n._africa_middleeast-2.pdf

Source: MN Raizada and LJ Smith (2016) A Picture Book of Best Practices for Subsistence Farmers: eBook, University of Guelph Sustainable Agriculture Kit (SAK) Project, June 2016, Guelph, Canada. Available online at: www.SAKBooks.com

Resources Moving Forward

ATTRA Sustainable Agriculture link is a quick guide to a variety of compost tea production systems. Retrieved from: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/viewhtml.php?id=125

ATTRA notes on compost teas. Retrieved from: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/summaries/summary.php?pub=125

Notes for compost teas and other pathogen treatments seen here: http://www.growseed.org/seedtreatments.html

Compost Tea: Principles and Prospects For Plant Disease Control: good literature on ACT and NCT with tables. Retrieved from: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/1065657X.2002.10702095

Outline of compost teas titled: Compost tea and its impact on plant diseases. Retrieved from: http://crophealth.com/wp/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/CropHealthcom-Sustainable-Compost-Tea-and-plant-diseases-2007-BCOrganicGrower-COABC.pdf

References

1. Appropriate Technology Transfer for Rural Areas, ATTRA. (1998). Notes on Compost Teas. National Center for Appropriate Technology (NCAT). Retrieved from: https://attra.ncat.org/attra-pub/viewhtml.php?id=125

2. Al-Dahmani, J. H., Abbasi, P. A., Miller, S. A., & Hoitink, H. A. (2003). Suppression of bacterial spot of tomato with foliar sprays of compost extracts under greenhouse and field conditions. Plant disease, 87(8), 913-919.

3. Gea, F. J., Navarro, M. J., & Tello, J. C. (2009). Potential application of compost teas of agricultural wastes in the control of the mushroom pathogen Verticillium fungicola. Journal of Plant Diseases and Protection, 116(6), 271-273.

4. Haggag, W. M., & Saber, M. S. M. (2007). Suppression of early blight on tomato and purple blight on onion by foliar sprays of aerated and non-aerated compost teas. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment, 5(2), 302.

5. Ingham, E., & Alms, M. (2003). Compost tea. Soil Foodweb Incorporated.

6. Lanthier, M., & Advising, C. (2007). Compost tea and its impact on plant diseases. BC Organic Grower, 10(2), 8-11.

7. Martin, C. C. S. (2014). Potential of compost tea for suppressing plant diseases. CAB Rev, 9(32), 1-12.

8. Scheuerell, S., & Mahaffee, W. (2002). Compost tea: principles and prospects for plant disease control. Compost Science & Utilization, 10(4), 313-338.

9. Scheuerell, S. J. (2004, September). Compost tea production practices, microbial properties, and plant disease suppression. In International Conference on Soil and Compost Eco-Biology